There are three main categories under which a product’s defects are categorized. They are defective design, defects in the product’s manufacturing, and the absence of sufficient warnings or instructions. To determine what a defective design is, the Pennsylvania courts consider whether the standard consumer would be in danger of injury or misuse of the product based on its design. The courts also determine whether the standard consumer runs the risk of injury not because of misuse, but during normal use. If this is the case, the product has a defective design, and consumers are entitled to seek damages for injuries and destruction caused while using the product.
As noted above, Pennsylvania’s product liability laws protect consumers from faulty products that have made the market, providing a path toward recovery of damages. According to the laws’ statutes of limitation, a lawsuit must be filed within two years of the damage caused by the product, whether that was an injury, damage to property, or even wrongful death. The Discovery Rule applies, as set as a precedent in Fine v. Checcio, meaning that if it is found that the product manufacturer fraudulently concealed information about the risk of the product, the two years within which the lawsuit must be filed will not begin until the time at which the consumer could have had reasonable awareness of those defects of the product. There are a number of cases in which the consumer could become aware that the product was faulty long after its implemented use and, at that time, become aware that the manufacturer or provider concealed its failure to function. One such example is in the case of a medical procedure or implant that was not successful. If the medical provider was aware of this failure and refused to let the patient know, the case of fraudulent concealment would apply, and the statute of limitations would not go into effect until the patient became aware of the fault.
A manufacturer must be more than 50 percent at fault, however, in order to be culpable in the eyes of Pennsylvania product liability laws. Because of the state’s comparative fault standards, the amount a consumer can recover is based on the percentage of fault the manufacturer had in causing the injury or defect. If a manufacturer was 100 percent at fault for causing the injury or accident due to their faulty product, they will be 100 percent liable for covering damages. However, if the consumer misused the product, for example, initiating the product’s fault, they could be found to be 20 percent liable for the injury and only recover 80 percent of the damages under product liability laws, for example. If the consumer was over 50 percent liable, they are not eligible to file a claim under Pennsylvania product liability laws.
At Cohen & Riechelson, our New Jersey attorneys support our clients in Bucks County and Northeast Philadelphia in all matters of injury and accident caused by faulty products.
To schedule a confidential case assessment with our firm today, call our Bensalem offices at (215) 337-4915 today to speak with a member of our legal team in a free and confidential consultation.
Personal injury cases may be won or lost on medical records. They play a crucial… Read More
You signed up for the recreational indoor volleyball league and are excited to exercise and… Read More
When you finally reach and receive a personal injury settlement, you probably feel and think… Read More
Stay Informed About Your Legal Options and Critical Next Steps if You Suffer Injuries in… Read More
Boating accidents are both very similar to, and totally different from, motor vehicle accidents. While… Read More
Everything You Need to Know about the Discovery Process of a Personal Injury Case in… Read More